Wolffian God is not
satisfied with mere contemplation of possibilities, but decides to
actualise one of the possible worlds. In order to do this, he needs
to have the capacity to actualise anyone of them. Indeed, God could
make anything happen that is possible and only impossibilities are
limits to his capacities – in effect, God is omnipotent, Wolff
says.
What God requires
for this use of his capacity is mere act of will. This is of course
completely different from what human beings do – in us, decision
and actualisation of a plan are two completely distinct events. In
fact, there is an even further difference, Wolff says. Human beings
usually start by contemplating all the possibilities and only after
careful consideration make their choice. With God, these two events
are connected in one act – God chooses even in contemplating
possibilities.
Now, when God chose
to actualise this world, he knew exactly what would happen in this
world, because he knows everything that would happen in any possible
world. This appears to lead to the famous problem of divine
prescience – how could our choices be completely free, if God
already knows what we are going to choose beforehand. The answer to
this problem is also quite traditional – knowing something does not
cause it, thus, even if God knows what Obama will do tomorrow, he did
not choose it for Obama's sake. Of course, this line of reasoning has
the striking weakness that God does choose the world that is to be
actualised and seems so responsible of everything that happens in the
world.
What is more
important is that God must have had some reason for picking this
particular world – as we know already, Wolff thinks it is because
the actual world is the most perfect of all worlds. The Leibnizian
story of a necessary evil which all worlds must have and which God
doesn't cause, but only allows should be familiar by now. Wolff also
emphasises God's wisdom and goodness. God is wise or he knows the best
means for actualising his ends, thus, the world and its laws are the
most efficient there can be and allow, for instance, human beings to
actualise their ends. Indeed, God has given humans liberty, because
he is good and hopes they will of their own choice make good
decisions – and even if they don't and end up doing evil things, in
the end, even this serves the final good.
God's wisdom is then
for the most part incomprehensible to human beings – we simply
cannot see all the strings that should turn evil actions into good
effects. Yet, God can reveal us information that goes over what we
can directly know through experience – Wolff's take on the idea of
divine revelation. This is also a good place to stop, because in next
post I will finally think of the ways God effects other things, that
is, nature and spirits.
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti